You open Figma to mock a new flow, and your Slack lights up. Engineering is blocked on a date picker. Marketing wants a dark theme by Friday. The last sprint ended with two versions of the same button. It is not that your team is slow. You are trying to ship without a shared system. Choosing a UI kit sounds like a design chore, but it quietly shapes everything that follows. It sets your pace, determines the cleanliness of your handoff, and limits or unlocks how your product can look in six months. Pick the wrong one and you spend cycles fighting overrides and version mismatches. Pick the right one and your team gets reusable parts, predictable tokens, and fewer surprises in code review. This guide looks at ten UI kits that real product teams rely on today. Some lean into ownership and customization. Others give you a proven language and strong documentation. You will see where each option shines, what the handoff looks like, and what it costs to live with day to day. The goal is simple: help you choose a kit that fits your roadmap, not just your next sprint. ## How we evaluate - **Design philosophy**: Strict design language or flexible foundation. - **Tech and styling**: Tailwind, Sass, CSS-in-JS, or native CSS. This affects performance, theming, and how easy overrides feel. - **Component depth**: Simple blocks vs tables, forms, editors, and charts. - **Design to code**: Figma kits, token sync, and plugins that keep files and code in step. - **Cost and licensing**: Open source, one-time purchases, and per-editor design kits. - **Maintenance**: Who owns the components long term and how updates flow. ## 1) shadcn/ui kit for Figma Link: shadcndesign.com **Best for**: Teams that want full component ownership with a clean bridge from Figma to production code. ### What it is shadcn/ui is an ownership model. You copy accessible React components into your repo and maintain them like your own. The Figma kit from shadcndesign mirrors the code with variables, Auto Layout, variants, and properties. The system is set up for multi-brand work through Figma variables mapped to Tailwind tokens and CSS variables. ### Design to code The dedicated plugin is the standout. Export tokens from Figma to CSS, import tokens from code back into Figma to stop drift, and generate shadcn/ui component code from selected frames. This creates a tight loop that reduces rework. ### Acceleration Pro Blocks, templates, and an Academy course cover common flows such as auth, dashboard shells, settings, and charts. Assets exist in both Figma and React. ### Pricing notes Tiered one-time licenses. Basic includes the kit. Plus adds Blocks and Templates in Figma with lifetime updates. Premium adds code versions and the plugin. AI features require separate API tokens. ### Watch outs Ownership brings responsibility. You choose when to adopt upstream changes and you maintain your fork. ## 2) Ant Design **Best for**: Data-dense internal tools and enterprise dashboards. ### What it is Ant Design focuses on complex forms, tables, and management screens. The table component is robust, with sorting, filtering, pagination, and editable rows. Forms and pickers cover many enterprise patterns. ### Design to code The leading Figma kit is provided by a third-party provider that aligns with the React library. Plugins help export theme settings to code and can generate component code from frames. ### Ecosystem AntV for charts, Ant Design Pro for templates, and Ant Design Mobile for phone UIs. Active open source community. ### Pricing notes React library is free. The professional Figma kit is a one-time purchase with tiers for features and team size. ### Watch outs You buy into a third-party Figma kit. Align your versioning process and plan for license coverage if your team grows past its limits. ## 3) Material UI (MUI) **Best for**: Large teams that need a familiar standard and strong documentation. ### What it is MUI implements Google’s Material Design in React. It covers inputs, navigation, feedback, surfaces, and data display. MUI X adds advanced data grid and charts. ### Design to code Paid Figma Design Kits pair with the Sync plugin. Designers can theme colors, type, spacing, and radii in Figma, then export a theme file for developers. This reduces one-off overrides and keeps styles aligned. ### Ecosystem Massive community, strong examples, and many templates. Easy to find answers and patterns. ### Pricing notes Core React library is MIT. Figma kits are licensed per editor, which grows with team size. MUI X adds another cost for advanced parts. ### Watch outs Material’s visual voice is strong. Getting a non-Material brand look can take effort. ## 4) Chakra UI **Best for**: Product teams that want speed, accessibility, and a clean developer experience. ### What it is Chakra ships accessible React components with composable style props for quick layout and theming. It hits a sweet spot between convenience and control. ### Design to code An official free Figma kit covers the basics. A paid design kit from the creator adds ready layouts for marketing and app UIs. There is no automated token sync, so teams keep Figma and the theme object in step manually. ### Ecosystem Chakra UI Pro for premium parts, plus community projects like Choc UI and Chakra Templates. ### Pricing notes Core and the basic Figma kit are free. Premium templates and the advanced Figma kit are one-time purchases. ### Watch outs Manual alignment between Figma and code needs process discipline. ## 5) Flowbite **Best for**: Engineering-led teams that treat code as the source of truth and build with Tailwind. ### What it is Tailwind UI ships HTML, React, and Vue snippets built by the authors of Tailwind. The Catalyst tier adds cohesive React components that can form your design system. Tailwind UI does not include Figma assets. Many teams pair it with Flowbite’s Figma kit, which brings variants, Auto Layout, and dark mode. ### Design to code Workflow is split across two vendors. Code comes from Tailwind UI. Figma assets come from Flowbite. This works well when development leads the process. ### Ecosystem Large Tailwind community, steady updates, and many examples. ### Pricing notes Tailwind UI is a one-time purchase with lifetime updates. Teams license covers up to 25 people. Flowbite’s Figma kit has free and Pro options sold separately. ### Watch outs The split workflow needs governance. Keep versions aligned and agree on patterns across the two sources. ## 6) HeroUI **Best for**: Aesthetic-driven React apps that want a modern look and smooth TypeScript DX. ### What it is HeroUI uses Tailwind at build time, so there are no runtime styles. Components are compatible with React Server Components and integrate with Framer Motion for clean animations. A slot-based API and polymorphic elements give fine control. ### Design to code An official free Figma kit mirrors the code and continues to evolve. It helps designers work with realistic states while developers use matching components. ### Pricing notes Core is MIT. The Pro tier adds more complex components with a one-time license. Pricing tiers map to team size. ### Watch outs The visual voice is present. It is themable, but not blank-slate. ## 7) Mantine UI **Best for**: Teams that want a comprehensive open-source toolkit with hooks, forms, and fast delivery. ### What it is Mantine offers 120+ components and 70+ hooks, plus a strong forms package. Styling uses native CSS and a PostCSS preset to avoid runtime cost. It works well with Vite, Next.js, Remix, and more. ### Design to code By design there is no official Figma kit. Community kits like Pretine fill the gap. The Styles API lets you override internal parts of any component to match your brand. ### Pricing notes MIT across the board. You only pay if you buy a third-party kit or template. ### Watch outs Enterprises that need official, code-aligned Figma files should plan for internal design assets or accept community kits. ## 8) Headless UI **Best for**: Teams building a bespoke design system that want accessible logic without any preset styling. ### What it is Headless UI provides unstyled, accessible primitives for React and Vue. You get behavior and state for Dialog, Menu, Listbox, Combobox, Tabs, Popover, Switch, and more. You bring the CSS or Tailwind classes. ### Design to code No official Figma kit. This is a code-first approach. Designers and developers define the visual language together, and the primitives supply the interaction layer. ### Pricing notes MIT. Pairs naturally with Tailwind or any CSS method. ### Watch outs Expect higher initial design effort. The long-term payoff is a system that fits your brand perfectly. ## 9) Bootstrap **Best for**: Standard responsive sites, prototypes, and teams that need dependable defaults. ### What it is Bootstrap remains a full, pre-styled framework using Sass and CSS variables. Version 5 removed the jQuery dependency and added a Utility API. You get the classic grid, navbars, modals, alerts, and forms. ### Design to code No official Figma kit. Many free and paid kits exist. Pick one and standardize on it to avoid drift. ### Pricing notes MIT. Commercial value lives in themes and templates you may choose to purchase. ### Watch outs The visual language is recognizable. Reshaping it to match a distinct brand can take time. ## 10) Microsoft Fluent UI **Best for**: Products inside the Microsoft 365 ecosystem and teams that need cross-platform parity. ### What it is Fluent UI is Microsoft’s design language with React for the web and native toolkits for Windows, iOS, and Android. The converged React v9 line focuses on smaller bundles and modern styling. ### Design to code Fluent 2 has official Figma assets with a structured program. There are design language files, Core UI Kits for each platform, Copilot kits for AI patterns, and Labs for experiments. This supports scale and governance. ### Component depth Beyond basics, you get DetailsList for grids, PeoplePicker for directories, CommandBar, and Shimmer. Accessibility and localization are treated as core features. ### Pricing notes MIT. The commercial value is alignment with Microsoft platforms. ### Watch outs If your brand is far from Microsoft’s look, expect more theming work. ## Quick comparison ### Ownership vs dependency **Ownership**: shadcn/ui for Figma. You copy code and maintain it. This maximizes control and reduces surprises from upstream releases. **Dependency libraries**: MUI, Ant Design, Chakra, HeroUI, Mantine, Bootstrap, Fluent. You install and theme. Updates flow as package versions. ### Figma integration **Bi-directional or code generation**: shadcn/ui for Figma. **Official, managed kits**: MUI, HeroUI, Fluent UI. **Community kits**: Mantine, Bootstrap. **None by design**: Headless UI. **Split vendor workflow**: Tailwind UI + Flowbite pairing. ### Advanced components out of the box **Data tables and forms**: Ant Design, MUI X, Fluent UI. **Rich text editor and hooks**: Mantine. **Headless primitives for custom UIs**: Headless UI. **Blocks and templates to speed delivery**: shadcn/ui for Figma, Tailwind UI, HeroUI Pro, Chakra UI Pro, Bootstrap themes. ### Customization and theming **Utility-first styling**: shadcn/ui, Tailwind UI, Headless UI, HeroUI. **Token and theme providers**: MUI, Ant Design, Fluent UI. **Hybrid with style props**: Chakra UI. **Native CSS and Styles API**: Mantine. **Sass variables and CSS variables**: Bootstrap. ### Cost shape **One-time purchases** common in shadcndesign.com Premium, Tailwind UI, HeroUI Pro, some third-party Figma kits. **Per-editor costs** for certain official Figma kits like MUI’s can add up at scale. **MIT libraries** reduce licensing overhead but may shift support onto your team. ## How to choose Ask four questions and match the result. ### Who will own components a year from now If your team wants control of the code and minimal dependency risk, pick shadcn/ui for Figma. If you want vendor-managed updates, use a dependency library. ### How strict is your visual identity If the brand must be unique, lean to Headless UI, shadcn/ui, or Mantine’s Styles API. If you want to ship quickly with a standard language, use MUI, Ant Design, or Bootstrap. If you live in Microsoft 365, use Fluent. ### How tight should design to code be If you need token parity and low drift, use shadcn/ui’s plugin loop or a first-party kit with managed sync such as MUI or Fluent. If you can manage it manually, Chakra with its Figma kits or Mantine with community kits will work. ### What accelerators do you need on day one If you need full screens and flows, pick a kit with blocks and templates. shadcn/ui’s Pro Blocks, Tailwind UI blocks, Ant Design Pro, HeroUI Pro, and Bootstrap themes all get you there fast. ## Suggested picks by scenario ### Brand-forward SaaS that must look and feel custom shadcn/ui for Figma if you want ownership and a token bridge. Headless UI if you want full control and will craft visuals from scratch. ### Fast-moving product team that wants strong DX and a modern look HeroUI. If you want open source breadth with forms and hooks, Mantine UI. ### Enterprise dashboards and admin tools Ant Design if you need tables and forms at depth. MUI with MUI X if you prefer the Material language and first-party ecosystem. Fluent UI if you live in Microsoft 365. ### Marketing sites and quick prototypes Bootstrap. Add a quality Figma kit and a theme to move faster. ### Utility-first teams with code-led workflow Tailwind UI with Flowbite for Figma. Keep versioning and patterns aligned across both. ### Accessibility as a first-class requirement with rapid theming Chakra UI. The style props and a11y defaults make it easy to do the right thing. ## Closing notes There is no single winner for every team. Your choice depends on ownership, design maturity, and the ecosystem you live in. If you want long-term flexibility and a reliable handoff, start with shadcn/ui for Figma. If you wish to have a confident standard and strong docs, MUI and Fluent do that well. If you need deep data components, Ant Design is hard to beat. If you value developer ergonomics and fast iteration, Chakra and Mantine are excellent. If engineering leads and Tailwind is your baseline, Tailwind UI plus Flowbite is a practical pairing. If you want a blank canvas with solid logic, Headless UI is the right foundation. For a dependable default on common web work, Bootstrap is still a smart pick. Select the system that ensures predictable handoffs and minimizes production surprises. That is how your UI kit pays for itself.

Best UI Kits in 2025: Top 10 Options for Figma and React Design Systems

Level-up your workflow today